Letter
from Lhasa, number 334. It is not Zersetzen.
It is S/G-OS, alias Disrupt &
Discredit [D&D] or Vigorous Harassment
by
Roberto Abraham Scaruffi
This work, Zersetzen/Zersetzung, in its different releases, is variously
deceptive while vividly representing the reality of State/Government-Organised Stalking [S/G-OS], alias, in Secret Police/government jargon, Disrupt & Discredit [D&D] or Vigorous Harassment [VH].
Its general frame is
deceptive. It uses the elements of S/G-OS for collocating them in a frame showing
this kind of clandestine operations as a deviation from some hypothetical right
way. On the contrary, S/G-OS is key part of the war of The Prince / State /
Government for destroying and keeping annihilated society/sociality and people.
Society/Sociality is independent
relatively to State/government, where and if it exist. Consequently,
State/government needs to liquidate it until its roots, family and
individuality. That is realized in different ways. S/G-OS operations are Secret
Police, alias government, clandestine
operations targeting individuals and their relational sphere.
S/G-OS operations do not
target ‘dissidents’. They try to create terrorism, revolt, to be manipulated,
managed and hetero-led. There is no possible comparison with Stasi or Gestapo techniques. Whatever comparison is highly deceptive.
S/G-OS is a classic
police scheme with government ordering its Secret Police departments to create
terrorists and terrorisms. It is not a persecution for making a dissident unemployed
and variously discredited. Not only that. Certainly, an S/G-OS operation wants
its target unemployed, discredited, disrupted and obstructed in its current
patterns of life and environments, but only of pushing it to some different,
predetermined [from the Secret Police in charge of the operation], way.
If power wants a target
liquidated, it liquidates it. An assassination is rapid and usually easy. If
all legal ways are obstructed, for the target, it is because power wants to
push the target to the only option apparently let opened and variously
indirectly suggested to the target.
S/G-OS has a
totalitarian program: “The target must not work, formally study, live. The
target must be pushed to clandestinity/illegality.” In fact the Secret Police
officer in charge of a certain S/G-OS operation creates or activates parallel
militias on the working place, study place and living place of the target for
its permanent harassment and obstruction.
The current life of the
target is banned. It must be pushed to a different, predetermined, direction.
Of course, firstly, a
Secret Police officer directly asks for and gets the cooperation of the top
levels, of the people in charge, of the operating theatres, what means owners,
managers, headmasters, rectors. Got their cooperation and activation against
the target, the Secret Police officer directly or indirectly organizes parallel
militias for attacking and obstructing the target’s current activities.
In an S/G-OS operation,
everything must appear as casual to the target. This is another key element of
the NATO manuals (elaborated with the help of academicians or
pseudo-academicians) about the implementation of S/G-OS operations.
More than “character
assassination”, S/G-OS is a character building. It states how one person should
behave, who and what the target should impersonate. “We ban you from your
current life while we tell you that you already are...”
That is done according
to a pseudo-sociological theory that if one is insistently told to be something
or somebody, one will conform to these unanimously suggested expectations. It
is not actually so easy, although this theory be founded on some normal mythomania
and conformism there be in anybody.
Not only. This theory
might work on a soldier, on a cop, on a ‘normal’ paranoid personality.
Soldiers, cops, Statesmen/women, criminologists, academicians have invented a
clandestine operation fit for themselves, thinking that it would have worked
with everybody else.
For instance, they hypothesize
that if, in a group, you tell a pupil that he/she is the best, the most
intelligent, and you treat him/her consistently with these assertions,
he/she’ll excel and become the first of the group, while it you tell him/her
that he/she is the worst, absolutely worthless, and you treat him/her
consistently with these assertions, he/she will get miserable results. It is
not so easy. Even if there were the cooperation of the family of the target and
a generalized mobbing against it, it is not at all certain that this para- o
pseudo-psychological, -sociological and -anthropological theory could work. It
could partially work in some cases. It could be irrelevant in other cases. It
could produce opposite results with certain subjects.
Statesmen/women,
soldiers and cops, bureaucrats, academicians, and other supposed specialists
and consultants, do not understand each other. They use different jargons and
obey to different conditioned reflexes. They cannot effectively communicate.
Over this incommunicability paradigm, and over their reciprocal
non-understanding and misunderstanding they have created State Terrorism
operations, S/G-OS included. All their State Terrorism operations are vicious creations
coming from reciprocally non-understanding and misunderstanding vicious minds and
personalities.
It is highly deceptive,
and self-absolving, even only to suggest that S/G-OS and other people
persecution and exploitation techniques come from other sources [Stasi etc]. The UK and the USA are
masters in everything. Of course their clients too. These are anyway universal
police and bureaucratic techniques used for evil purposes.
If one wants to be more
precise, it is quite sure that ancient Empires/States/governments already knew and
practised all the various forms of State Terrorism, S/G-OS included.
Unfortunately, the art and the technology of power are the art and the
technology of manipulating other people.
All these deceptions
about S/G-OS and other persecutions, harassment, tortures, are spread thanks to
the internet for confusing people, for cheating real targets, for influencing
non-TI [Targeted Individual] psychopaths so that they could absolve themselves
convincing themselves that they be insane since external forces, so that they be
not really insane but only subjugated from somebody or something else. These
non-TI psychopaths are very useful for permitting State/government agents to
claim that all people telling that they are under S/G-OS be actually psychopaths
inventing everything.
Of course, it is
possible to be a psychopath and a TI too. Secret Police agents and the
Statesmen/women signing S/G-OS, and other persecutions and crimes, secret
decrees, as well as their academic advisers, bureaucrats, and their militians
on the field, are super-psychopaths. Differently they could not order,
implement, be involved in such insanities and crimes.
Similarly, there are
real S/G-OS TIs convinced from all these deceptions of being targets also or
only of something else. A full awareness of that be happening is extremely
rare.
While many people are
ashamed or unaware of what be really happening to them, online one can discover
abundance of just psychopaths having suddenly discovered the literature about S/G-OS
and other forms of State Terrorism, and using this literature for
self-deresponsabilizing relatively to their pathologies. They create an
external absolution while the problem is inside them. These fake TIs are
created and encouraged from the massive State/government-spread deception there
is online. That is done for slandering and discouraging real TIs.
Another deception is
about “Secret Services”. It is not a question of secret and intelligence
services. Without Secret Police powers there are not S/G-OS and other
State/government-organized persecutions, harassment, tortures, insanities and
crimes.
Secret Police
departments and officers are by whatever military, para-military, police and
para-police, or also other corps. They are even by Refugee Boards and Courts.
Of course, they call themselves in other ways or in no way, not “Secret Police
Unit [or whatever]” of a certain bureaucracy. They have special
cards-regulations according them the power to commit crimes (whatever crime),
to obstruct or to promote judiciary actions, to be legally unaccountable, of
course under tight institutional orders and control.
It is better to
underline that these operations of State Terrorism are illegal according to the
current ‘normal’ law although they be not at all illegal since there is a
precise legal frame allowing them and covering them by the State Secret. There
are laws according extraordinary powers to government, included the power to
commit crimes for actually vague “reasons of State security” or similar concepts
or claims.
Since it is impossible
to really control government, and no really independent source could determine
whether there really be or not any “reasons of State security”, it is
sufficient to claim that there be for getting infinite powers, outside whatever
current law, for covering whatever crime and with the cover of the State
Secret. Consequently, no judiciary could ever inquiry just a “reason of State
security”, with annexed State Secret, be raised. In addition, the State Secret
makes impossible, for whomever, to know anything about crimes committed under
the claim of the “reasons of State security”. Whatever secondary or relevant
episode of State Terrorism, from an unknown assassination to 9/11, is ordered,
implemented and covered using this legal frame.
This legal frame is
created and works in this way, in whatever country of the world:
1. Laws accord special
powers to government for “reasons of State security” and with the connected
State Secret. These laws give government the power to further regulate the
matter by specific and detailed regulations.
2. By government-created
regulations, Secret Police departments and officers are instituted by various
military, para-military, police and para-police, or also other corps. A Secret
Police officer has the legal power, on government orders, to commit crimes, to
give orders to the judiciary, as well to whatever public bureaucracy.
Consequently, he/she can easily get the obedience of whomever and whatever.
3. For whatever
operation of State Terrorism, a government secret decree is necessary. No
Secret Police officer would be involved in assassinations and massacres, as
well as in persecutions etc, without being sure to be legally unaccountable, so
without full legal cover.
For each S/G-OS
operation, as well as for assassinations etc, there is a government secret
decree for each single TI. It is as the assassination “executive orders” of the
US Presidents. In countries where there is not a monocratic power, both the
head of State and the formal government (head of the government and one or more
ministers), eventually also parliament, need to sign these secret decrees. If
one signature lacks, nothing can be done.
Wherever and whenever
there be terrorist operations from hetero-led terrorist groups, there is a
previous secret decree of the formal institutions of that country to one of its
Secret Police departments or officers. Eventually, for intra-institutional
feuds, some assassinations or other crimes are masked behind other frames, so
that formal Statesmen/women sign something different from a decree with the
formal name of the target.
The coup d’État against
Kennedy was an operation clearly could not be done with the signature of the
target. For the Moro assassination, Giulio Andreotti, who ordered it for
hampering him from becoming President of the Republic in a few months, covered
himself behind NATO frames. For S/G-OS operations, electronic torture et similia (improperly called “mind
control”), there are specific decrees for each target. The State Secret covers the same existence of all these criminal and
insane operations.
There are clandestine
operations of State Terrorism and there is the State Secret not only about them
but also about their same existence. It is not allowed to talk about them. If
there are questions about them, government has the legal power, actually the
legal duty, to lie so to legally claim that they do not exist. According to this
occult legislation (but deriving from parliamentary public laws giving
government special powers “for reasons of State security”, for whatever “state
of exception”, “state of emergency” et
similia, also mini-exceptions and emergencies), government is absolutely
unaccountable relatively to whatever current legality. The Prince, the
Sovereign, can do whatever he wants since he apodictically acts for the public
good. In the name of this public good, he has the right and the duty to
transcend the rule of law. Since “the public good” is practically indefinable,
this supposed public good allows government to do whatever it want.
Manipulating media, as
well as idiotic people believing them, tales about ‘Illuminates’, ‘Reptilians’
etc are widely spread. More precisely, ‘Reptilians’, intended as parallel
realities interfering with our visible one, other dimensions for instance, are perhaps
possible. We cannot anyway discuss what we cannot see or infer. ‘Illuminati’
intended as a mysterious secret lodge governing humanity, is something
impossible. Secret lodges are Secret Police-controlled and led entities. More
powerful of the most powerful governments are only the few people/networks
controlling them. They are bureaucratic and private oligarchies. They do not
have a name. They are not a society or a club. They are networks. Sometimes
they have rites, although inessential.
The author of this work,
a real TI (or, at least, he decidedly seems such for what he describes),
although understanding his troubles come from State/government apparatuses,
does not show any comprehension of bureaucratic command chains. MI5/6 and CSIS
act on formal government orders, what means secret decrees signed from Prime
Ministers, Ministers, Royal House, with a formal statement that one is
targeted, submitted to S/G-OS, since some “reason of State security”. Nothing
could happen without the written order of these entities. The government secret
decree states the characteristics of the S/G-OS, which anyway follows patterns
precisely defined in NATO manuals. However variations are always possible
according to the supposed characteristics of the target and according to what
be wanted it to do.
Psychological profiles
of the targets are elaborated for each S/G-OS operation, although they be highly
unreliable. They are elaborated from insane, criminal and ignorant soldiers and
cops in constant interactions with psychopath academicians or
pseudo-academician, researcher or pseudo-researches, and basically evil people
supposedly near to the TI, as family members, relatives, acquaintances,
‘friends’ or supposed such.
Since committees govern
such clandestine operations, everything needs to appear plausible. For
appearing plausible, each party of this committee work tries to minimise its
own risks of appearing wrong. It is a bureaucratic law. Success is not
important. Instead one needs to minimize one’s own risks.
For a bureaucracy, it is
preferable a sure moderate [or felt as moderate] failure than the risk of a real
failure as a consequence of having operated for a real success. A bureaucracy
likes irresponsibility so that an eventual success be a common one, while a
failure without any detectable responsible. Something of the kind: “We have
followed predetermined and unanimously accepted procedures.” For whatever
bureaucrat, it is better to be wrong with whomever else than to risk to achieve
success alone.
Consequently, whatever
be told and written, about the target, relies on the ground of banality and
obviousness. What means that such psychological profiles, for such S/G-OS operations,
do not work. It would be anyway highly doubtful that even with a precise
psychological profile of the target such S/G-OS implementation committees could
ever elaborate a personalized S/G-OS. They just simulate to do what they cannot
actually do.
Anyway, the S/G-OS goes
on along its traditional program: “The target must not work, formally study,
live. The target must be pushed to clandestinity/illegality.” When a target
unmasks such operations, so they are really and clamorously failed, the S/G-OS
program becomes: “The target must not work, formally study, live. The target
must be psychologically and physically annihilated and removed.” It is a war
can evolve in different ways according to specific conditions. There are too
many variables making substantially indefinable the outcomes of such fights or
interactions.
The stalkers’ mortality
is decidedly high, while an S/G-OS operation is not an open and direct
assassination of the target. So, an S/G-OS operation can last decades with very
high costs for government and its militians, and with growing government
discredit if its activities become public.
The author well
represents the deniability (from power/government) of what purposely happens. ‘They’
do everything (apart from what one, although a real TI, if too emotional, might
sometimes imagine they do while they be not actually doing) while they want to
convince even you that you, not them, have some problem. In their favour, there
is that talking about such things may be perceived as self-discrediting, for a
target.
Of course, it depends on
the way one publicly talk about what they do. One needs to find an unemotional
way and also a mass media-style way for relating what happening. People believe
more to what published than to what told, about these matters. It is better not
to talk too much. It is more proper and useful to extensively write.
There are many fake TIs,
or also real ones, using emotional approaches and an overcharged expressive
style. Nobody usually contradicts emotional presentations. What is not sure is
that someone might really believe them, apart from other fake TIs so creating a
self propelling community of fake although uncontradictable subjects. However
this mass of fake TIs is easily used for discrediting real cases, if some
government agent is sent in special mission on forums and para-forums.
Another aspects usually
undervalued is that it is easier, for power, to manipulate organizations,
groups, instead than individuals. Not only the apparent strength of a group is
the number of its members, so its fake cases contribute to its apparent
strength. Even a pure group of real TIs is easily manipulable from power, since
innate group dynamics.
For instance, there are
mass petitions, or also lawsuits, even continuously repeated, in some cases. It
would be senseless opposing them, because one would seem sent from
power/government for avoiding clamours, although one could abstain from
participating. However, despite the honesty of the promoters, which is always
difficult to assess (as it is usually impossible or problematic to know whether
and how an activist be manipulated), is it really useful or instead is counterproductive
to show an indestructible faith on the some powers/governments/institutions striking
you? Of course, also petitions and lawsuits may be forms of denunciation,
although the denunciation work might be more effective in other ways than through
petitions and lawsuits where languages/jargons are more restricted since the
formality of these acts.
Unity and organization
can be strength, in certain matters. They are not such in matters of individual
rights and freedoms where whatever unity and organization not only recreate
authoritarian patterns but they are also inevitably manipulated from
power.
An additional aspect, absolutely
ignored, since people do not understand bureaucratic procedures, and how legal
and psychological aspects be filtered by bureaucracies, is the building of a
target.
We must start by saying
that from the point of view of what State/government and power be,
interpersonal links of submission, dependency, ownership over other people,
there is no difference between current times and feudal and anterior ones. The
Prince / State / government / bureaucracies are considered [or they consider
themselves and act as] owners of those improperly called citizens.
The etymological meaning
of ‘citizen’ is inhabitant of a city or town, although its historical meaning
be that of titular of rights as a freeman. This ownership/entitlement of rights
has being largely claimed although it largely be appearance.
Even when the vote of
everybody became officially equal, with the same formal power, it has been manipulated
before and perverted later the instant of its formal expression. It is
absolutely inevitable that wealth and material power weight more than a formal
expression of will. In addition, there never is a pure expression of will,
instead just the expression of a preference among a predetermined range of
possibilities. When means that also the moment of the expression of a supposed
free will is manipulated or perverted from those owning real power. One can
choose among predefined choices. Whatever the majority choose, there are not
real differences.
All that can happen
because people are not equal. They cannot be equal. Dependency/Ownership of
individuals from other people and property rights over other people are going
on also if not declared as such.
If there is no
substantial difference, about the property and dependency of individuals from
The Prince, the complexification of power makes it less monocratic, more
similar to a network also if with hierarchies inside it, although even in
ancient time there was not absolute monocracy. Power always has been a complex
matter.
There are networks of
hierarchies, not monocratic hierarchies. Consequently, the more power becomes
more complex, the more usual proprietary rules are adapted to this complexification
of power. Actually, as already told, power as not absolutely monocratic and as
a network is not a novelty of nowadays realities. However, now, there is
certainly abundance, a real proliferation, of committees (soviets), and of
routinary and procedural ways of decision.
Committees/soviets, as
whatever ‘democratic’ technique, exalt the worst of people. Also absolute power
does that, being it highly depended from who the monocratic decision makers be.
We have no preference and no solution. We are only expressing how reality be,
of course from the point of view of who is now writing here.
Unfortunately, State
Terrorism, is its various forms, does not seem a pathology just of nowadays
times. That should induce whatever political scientist, social analyst etc, if
there really are (or are there only power cantors?), to question the evil
nature of power. We are not proposing any anarchist alternative. The game of ‘alternatives’
is a tricked game.
State/government
evidently has an innate evil nature. The absence of some external order would
be perhaps even worse. We have not the custom to suggest imaginative sugary
utopias. Freely discussing problems is more scientific and intellectually
honest than recurring to current servile stereotypes and idiosyncrasies as
academicians and other subjects usually do.
Not only freedoms’/liberties’
questions contradict current propagandas. Also what had been called ‘democracy’,
although presented as very sounding, presents insuperable theoretical,
practical, factual problems.
The mechanism of
whatever committee/soviet is that whatever member, for not being excluded and
discriminated, behaves as he/she thinks the other people would expect he/she
behave. As a result of that, whatever collective/democratic structure
(committee/soviet) creates as a generalized conformism at the worst possible
level. There is a kind of competition for not being worse than the other ones,
of course ‘worse’ while appearing absolutely reasonable. This not being worse actually
means not being better than other ones, because noble feelings are not usually
appreciated. Instead apparently reasonable worse ones are.
All that resolves in a
combination of infamy, evil, paranoia, schizophrenia, eventually masking
everything behind sugary feelings, for appearing absolutely conformist, the
most conformist. ‘Democracy’ cannot work without conformism. At the same time,
conformism is the grave of whatever really human and positive impulse, so of
whatever freedom.
‘Democracy’ works in this
way. You need to be wrong together with other people instead than right alone. Wherever
there be committees/soviets, what occurs everywhere in nowadays world, that is
what happens.
That is what takes
places also in current State Terrorism. Even the Presidents of the USA and the
British Crown decide assassinations and persecutions through committees, not
individually.
Function of routines and
procedures is avoiding thinking, so automatizing decisions. Useful in certain
fields, they become deresponsabilization of the decision makers, in matters of
rights and freedoms. There is an additional element. Whatever criminal machine
deresponsabilizes its cogs, its members, fragmenting the different aspects of
its working.
Taylorism has a double
face: efficiency and deresponsabilization. The cogs of a mechanism have no apparent
responsibility about what the machine be doing. If the same decision maker is a
secret one or, anyway, a collective one, no one is responsible for whatever
might be ordered to a criminal machine. These are traditional techniques of
bureaucratic deresponsabilization. No one has moral and legal responsibility of
whatever.
That is even more
evident with drones. They are also physically distant from decision makers and
executers, who act according to confuse information.
A target, a TI, is not abstractly selected. The
State Terrorist machine is an adaptive machine. A target needs to be built. One
of the goals of an S/G-OS operation is to isolate the target. However, until a
target is not isolated, or sufficiently isolated, an S/G-OS operation may not
start.
First, someone needs to
propose someone else as a target, as a potential TI. There is a kind of
candidacy process. It may be an intra-institutional feud, where somebody more
powerful proposes the liquidation of a competitor. It may be a company, a
public bureaucracy, a family or its factions, a political party or a trade
union, or the same Secret Police, by one of its officers, or as a collective
request, for some further evil utilization of a certain individual.
The first application is
of this kind: “We highlight this subject, because xxx, for Disrupt&Discredit [D&D] or Vigorous Harassment”, alias
for S/G-OS, or also for worse programs.
If the application is
deemed, and not simply discharged, so if the Secret Police / government is
interested in it, the Secret Police / government needs to built a consensus
around it. In practice, it needs to verify that the potential target be not covered
from some powerful or relevant entity, be it a political party, a trade union,
a family, a public bureaucracy, a Masonic lodge, a relevant company or other
private or non-private interest.
Verified that a
potential target is uncovered or without relevant cover, the proposal of the
clandestine operation against a specific target is submitted to real
government, in its different branches [head of State, head of the formal
government, competent ministers, a competent Parliament commission], and a secret
decree with the name of the target and the characteristics of the clandestine operation
against it is issued, or it is not if the real government is not unanimous
about that. Such decrees may be later changed, updated, upgraded or downgraded.
An operation may be rectified,
cancelled, upgraded or downgraded in various ways, extended abroad but now with
other entities agreement and co-participation. “Other entities” means, for
instance, NATO what means worldwide extension since the Anglo-Americans have
the control of nearly the whole world, even of the large majority of apparently
enemies countries/States/governments, in these matters.
Yes, even apparently
enemy countries actually cooperate in matters of State Terrorism. Usually, there
are not national or unfriendliness barriers, for persecutions and other crimes.
Even the refugees industry is a tricked market where individuals are sold and
bought. “You where honest there. We make you our criminal here!”
Of course, since it is
everything secret, relatively to the target, and covered from the State Secret
(what means that may not even be told that such operations exist), there is
total official denial even when the target becomes absolutely aware of what be
going on. At the same time, different justifications/lies are provided to the
different cogs of the insane and criminal S/G-OS [or other operation] machine.
Many of them are irregulars, with high mortality. Finally, State/government and
its parallel militias are more annihilated than their targets.
This paper, from Mr. Roderick
Russell, is very valuable as a testimony of a real case of very harsh S/G-OS.
Classic S/G-OS usually avoids any physical contact and any direct physical harm
of the target, while in this case there is this variation. Classic S/G-OS wants
to convince the target that everything be casual and he be a misfit person,
while here the attack is frontal and absolutely evident. Here, the direct
family of the S/G-OS target is directly attacked together with the main target,
so directly involved, as additional targets, in the same S/G-OS operation. We
have not many details about the original family and the enlarged family of the
target. However the direct family (wife and children) of the target has not
been broken up, so it is variously attacked in all its members.
It is absolutely evident
that the formal institutional orders to attack the target and his family by a
very harsh S/G-OS come from governments, PMs and ministers + Royal House and
Parliament (which devolve their powers on these matters to useless Commissions
not interfering with whatever Secret Police / government insanity and crime),
while the main target, Mr. Roderick Russell, seems to believe that “Secret
Services” give orders to government.
The ‘applicant’ for the
harsh S/G-OS operation against the target clearly is Grosvenor, for what the
target tells in this paper. He seems to have broken some unwritten agreement
that a job for this company is a job for life, without any possibility of
leaving it. Probably there are also other aspects he may not tell.
At page 42-43, the
author asks why media be “so fearful of the intelligence agencies?” Nobody,
apart from people’s innate conformism, is fearful of whatever “intelligence
agency”. On the contrary, nearly everybody is fearful of somebody, a Secret
Police officer, can ruin your life or even assassinate you while being legally
unaccountable and precisely because legally unaccountable. No one has any
defence apart from one’s own morality, what may not be of any practical
utility. In addition, the average ‘animal’ is variously adaptive and without
any intention to resist very powerful entities.
If one does not
understand the command chain: institutions => Secret Police departments and
officers => their legal unaccountability, and what a Secret Police and
Secret Government be, clearly one tries to discuss silly questions and giving
senseless answers.
It is not a ‘banal’
question of “corrupted power elites”. It is something decidedly more terrible.
There is the formal law. Government has the formal and legal power to violate
this formal law while enjoying absolute unaccountability.
In presence of an
apparently irresistible power attacking you, the average subject escapes,
subtracts oneself or, eventually, looks for your ‘defects’: “What have you
done?”, “It is not possible they attack you!”, “Why you?”, “If they attack you,
it surely is because you did something!”, “YOU must be guilty!”.
Whatever lynching has
its roots in the fear of the power ordering it and in the innate evil and
sadism giving satisfaction when committing crimes in a condition of absolute
unaccountability. There is an additional aspect. For people without any
morality and without any real personal identity, lynching is constitutive of a
personal and of a collective identity. The same lynching is an identity. “I am
because I lynch in cooperation with other louses as me!”: this is the leitmotif
of the common louse.
Yes, as the author
personally tested, ‘ordinary’ police corps, the CSIS-MI5/6 etc, formal
institutions, the judiciary, media, Amnesty International, the Canadian Human
Right Commission, the whole “Human Rights Industry”, whoever and whatever
becomes a branch, militians, of the Secret Police just a Secret Police officer
shows his/her card and says: “We need your help!”
Actually, people whose
help (for committing insanities and crimes, for persecuting other people) is
asked may subtract themselves, leave the operational theatre, but not oppose
what is going on. They might easily become a Secret Police target.
Of course, as the author
states and proves, there is nothing extraordinary about his case. Persecutions are
common and current government practice. Official ‘justice’ is perverted. Documents
disappear. They can do whatever they want. ...You too...
Complaining to formal
authorities/institutions is opposed from people in office and from their Secret
Police apparatuses because the simulation that those in office know nothing
must be preserved. Power must diffuse the myth, must instil the belief, that
obscure forces be the only responsible of what actually is just State Terrorism.
The author is absolutely
wrong when he mythicizes State Terrorism and its persecutions: “Zersetzen is a
highly sophisticated and prolonged slander, intimidation and harassment
campaign” (p. 47).
“Highly sophisticated”?!
Secret Police officers show a card giving them absolute powers over other
State/government apparatuses and absolute unaccountability. They are legally
unaccountable insane and covered State/ government mafiosi and terrorists. By
these powers, they persecute people on the working place, in educational
institutions, in their living place and in whatever they do. With the same card/cover
they organize and lead mafias and terrorist groups. For that, they use written
manuals, what means pre-defined routines and procedures.
Where is the
sophistication?! They are just insane and criminal chaps with total cover, so
legally unaccountable, and at the orders of insane and criminal Statesmen/women.
Cooperation with the academic world further broadens the area of responsibility
and fragments the perception of being really committing insanities and crimes,
so that each one of these louses (Statesmen/women, Secret Police officers,
external ‘experts’, of course also their militians on the field) feels or
simulates to feel as a cog of a big and unrestrainable machine. Each one feels
or simulates to feel morally absolved and convinces oneself of acting for some
highest reason of State, ...persecuting people, assassinating, organizing
mafias and terrorisms. They are just obtuse and insane criminal psychopaths
exalted by impunity.
Yes, it is a sounding
tale that Secret Police departments be out of control. Simply, it is not
possible. They want YOU believe that they be out of control. In this way,
nobody is morally and politically responsible. They already have legal
unaccountability, but only when they act under institutional control and act on
institutional order.
They want you believe
that there be obscure forces, secret and indefinable conspiracies, elusive
mysteries. It always very difficult to see what is just under your nose.
They do not want you
know that. The belief that they be out of control solves whatever problem, from
this point of view. On the contrary, they always are under tight institutional
control: Crown, formal government, prime minister, ministers, parliament.
If somebody and
something devolves or has been obliged to devolve one’s own power, there is anyway
some final accountability, for instance of the Head of State, for instance the
Crown, in the British Empire area. The same author argues about that (p. 49),
while going on mixing this understanding with the claim that secret apparatuses
be out of control.
The only limit they have
consists in their bureaucratic routines and procedure. Their committee/soviet structure
is also a restraint making them slow. If you are alone, you have no constraint,
and you can act rapidly, if you have no fear.
