29 February 2012

Letter from Lhasa, number 266. State/Government-organized Stalking

Letter from Lhasa, number 266. State/Government-organized Stalking   
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

What is currently called gang-stalking is actually State/Government-organized Stalking and is triggered and managed by Secret Police officers at institutional orders.

Independent gang-stalking is very rare and technically nearly impossible. It could not cover all the aspects of the targets’ life. In addition, independent stalking can be easily repressed form police services.

State/Government-organized Stalking is a form of internal State Terrorism. It is pseudo-consensus founded on State internal-Terrorism. It is State Terrorism for the total annihilation of society. It is current practice in modern and contemporary States.   

More than a technique of social control, what is not, State/Government-organized Stalking is a form of society destruction and of permanent State/government terrorism against everybody. For this kind of dirty jobs, Secret Police officers have institutional mandates. Presidents, Queens and Kings, governments and parliaments sign implementation orders for each State/Government-organized Stalking operation, for each persecution against independent subjects, and provide total cover for these insane and criminal State activities they order.

Each State/Government-organized Stalking operation is explicitly authorized by the signatures of Presidents, Queens/Kings, Heads of Governments, Ministers and Parliamentary Committees under secret formal acts. Without all the due institutional signatures, no Secret Police officer would dare to implement any State/Government-organized Stalking operation. These acts are covered by the State Secret. From a legal point of view, there are laws and regulations making possible and covering these State/government criminal and insane activities.

Comprador States/governments have the additional constraint (external constraints) of secret international treaties about State terrorism and State/Government-organized Stalking. Consequently, nobody is authorized to even talk about them.

The British and the U.S. terrorist systems, of which State/Government-organized Stalking is a part, cover nearly the whole world and even not formally allied areas as the Chinas and the Russias are subordinated to these two main and hegemonic terrorist systems. For persecuting people, and even without any rational reason, nearly all the States of the world are happily and promptly cooperating.

State/Government-organized Stalking is composed of white torture and social lynching (with annexed various collateral forms of mobbing). It invests all the aspects of the target’s life: living places, working places, educational places, associational and social life. Generally, also the Interpol files are falsified from Secret Police corps so that the target can be followed and promptly persecuted even abroad. That happens both inside and outside the NATO area. Even not-allied and enemies States/governments become ‘friends’ for State/Government-organized Stalking

The British and U.S. Empires have secret pacts for State/Government-organized Stalking also outside the areas of their formal/official influence. For instance, they can follow a target even in China (PRC, not only the RoC) with great cooperation from Chinese Secret Police corps against their targets. Evidently, in their turn, they help Chinese Secret Police corps when they ask for ‘NATO’ help against their own targets.

In the very early September 2002, the SIS-CIA have provided the Chinese Secret Police of devices for watching through walls. The Chinese have used them against Italian and NATO targets and they have started to train both Chinese Secret Police offices and militians (irregulars, louses) to the use of them for white torture, specifically for apartment/edifice white torture (by the now http://www.swnu.edu.cn/ , Chongqing). Now, these then NATO secret military devices are currently produced and used for internal State Terrorism in the PRC.    

Apartment/building State/Government-organized Stalking is a combination of white torture and social lynching. The bordering neighbours of the target are mobilized for the white torture of the target. External militians are sent for helping or replacing them. The main sites of apartment/building State/Government-organized Stalking, in practice all the bordering apartments or spaces (besides, above and below), are covered by individuals and teams covering the target’s apartment 24 hours a day. Since Secret Police officers have not infinite means, the target may be let occasionally uncovered for some alternated hours, although the apartment/building State/Government-organized Stalking formally require the target be constantly bombarded with targeted noises and it feel constantly tailed when inside its apartment or room.       

Although organized and led from Secret Police officers, the implementation on the ground is delegated to irregular militians (insane louses) under tight Secret Police control and with the duty of daily reports. Militians are louses occasionally recruited on the gang-stalking sites. Eventually, they are reused on other apartment/building State/Government-organized Stalking sites. In fact, on the gang-stalking sites, there always is an insufficient availability of louses. However, there are not stable corps of irregulars for these insanities and crimes. Generally, they are not paid. It a kind of voluntary work for committing State/government ordered and protected insanities and crimes. Eventually, these louses have other benefits or an apparent absence of disadvantages. They are louses of whatever social group and educational level, from illiterate louses to PhDs.  

The first victims of State/Government-organized Stalking operations are the louses used for white torture and other insanities and crimes, and the Secret Police officers leading them. They are psychopathic criminals with instable mood, oscillating between high exaltation and deep depression. They are provided with drugs, what worsens their syndromes. They need to be frequently replaced because rapidly exhausted and psychoticized. They require to be frequently brainwashed for remotivating them.

Equilibrated, or at least prudent or wise, people generally malinger and leave the gang-stalking site. That is not always possible. Moral people simply would say “no”. Moral people are very rare.

In parallel with apartment gang-staling, the social lynching (with annexed various forms of mobbing) against the target covers living places, working places, educational places, associational and social life. Secret Police officers directly contact employers and educational places directors, as well as parents, relatives, acquaintances and friends of the target, vaguely telling them that there is some mysterious and untellable investigation against the target, that the target is suspect of something may not be told, that mobbing, white lynching and white torture must be organized against the target for inducing him/her to go away, that it is absolutely prohibited to give the target any chance, advancement, benefit, formal educational degree, because “the State/government does not want”.

Secret Police officers, acting as rough but irresistible pimps, use a mix of indirect slandering against the target and of subtle threats against employers and educational places directors, as well as parent, relatives, acquaintances and friends of the target, if they will not do what they ‘suggest’ them. These rumours are spread also by living places and by associations, political parties, community places the target may eventually frequent. According to circumstances, mobbing is organized, from Secret Police offices, even in these places.

In the key nodes of State/Government-organized Stalking operations, slanderous rumours are directly triggered from Secret Police officers. On the ground they are spread from operational louses, from other militians and even manipulating and using, when possible, hateful parents, relatives, acquaintances.   

Occasionally, white torture (targeted hitting of walls and floors) may be organized in educational institutions or other places the target frequents daily and at precise times, if and when there are not witnesses. White torture is avoided if potential witnesses are present. The target is targeted only if other people cannot hear anything. For white torture, small military devices for watching through walls are use. They localize the target. They can discriminate between the target and other people. They detect whether the target has opened or closed eyes. In fact, the louses for the white torture are provided with precise instructions about what to do when the target be awake and when he/she be apparently sleeping. The targeted noises are different.

The Secret Police officers use gang-stalking NATO operational manuals written from psychopathic criminal academicians cooperating with State terrorism. What should work from the paranoid point of view of academicians, Secret Police officers and louses on the ground frequently does not work against targets if they are not paranoid. It works, on the contrary, against these same inept and psychopathic criminal pseudo-hunters, which so are, at the same time, butchers and victims of themselves.

Gang-staling NATO operational manuals provide some rough suggestion for starting the apartment/palace white torture. However, since the numerous failures in this kind of operations, they have been rectified ordering to the louses on the ground to start with some rough wall and floor hitting and door violent slamming, et similia, while detecting what apparently strike/hurt the target and so adapting the white torture to the target’s maximum damage. That generally translates in the louses’ maximum damage, when they have to deal with aware targets.

The louses of the ground are firstly deceived, from their leading Secret Police officers, with the generally false belief of a rapid annihilation of the target. Just that does not happen, the louses are plunged into hyper delusional states.  

Since Secret Police officers complained about the vagueness and improbability of gang-staling NATO operational manuals written from academicians, these psychopathic criminal academicians retaliated introducing a new complication in these gang-staling manuals. NATO sadist academic contractors, claiming the invented authority of inexistent researches, have written that the target must be convinced that everything be normal and that he/she be imagining everything. Consequently, the Secret Police officers try to recruit embarrassed psychopaths approaching the target for telling him/her that he/she be imagining to be targeted.

So, Secret Police officers and their louses have now to send their targets other psychopathic criminals who, awkward and embarrassed, try to talk with the target for telling him/her that the targeted hammering of walls and floors, and the targeted repeatedly slamming of doors for thousand times during day and night etc be normal, that targeted mobbing be normal, that not providing degrees after successfully terminated academic programs be normal, and that the target must convince him/herself that he/she be inventing everything.

In parallel, a relevant deception program has been implemented on the media, specifically on the Internet, where now the large majority of materials about State/Government-organized Stalking and other State terrorism is produced from State/government and para-State/government entities and spread from para-State/government websites. Improbable and impossible conspiracies have been created about State/Government-organized Stalking and other State terrorism for blaming everybody else but not States/governments. All that is just State/government deception for hiding the reality of State/Government-organized Stalking.

For instance, this is a para- and pro-State/government definition of gang-stalking, whose only goal is to confuse targets, to remove the reality that only States/ government can organize, implement and cover gang-stalking operations, and for discrediting targets who believe, report and spread such nonsense:
“Organized Gang Stalking, also known as Gang Stalking, Cause Stalking, Organized Vigilante Stalking, Stalking by Proxy, Community-Based Harassment, and Covert War, are essentially harassment and discrediting campaigns waged against a targeted individual. Citizens, are recruited or coerced to participate, often from extremist groups and cults, but also from among employees. Coordinated psychological warfare attacks, consisting of Harassments, Organized Stalkings, Noise Campaigns, Sensitizing Operations and the spreading of lies slander and rumors, are executed in an effort to virtually neutralize and destroy the victim. "Mainstream USA believes that if Organized Gang Stalking hasn't happened to them then it is not happening to anyone else. Or if someone is 'Organized Gang Stalked' they must be a horrible person who has committed horrible acts and that they deserve it, thus creating more 'Organized Gang Stalkers'."” 

This is a perfect deception for conditioning conditionable targets and spreading the theory of mysterious entities targeting them. There are not mysteries. There are not independent “extremist groups and cults”. There are only States/government and their Secret Police corps and officers, with NATO active assistance and cover, and even with worldwide active assistance and cover, since States/governments reciprocally cooperates in their insanities and crimes.

In addition to too professional websites, there are super-professional video, for an even dirtier job: to convince conditional target, and also not real targets, that the most casual and unlikely organized events are ‘gang-stalking’. It is an operation for inducing destructive self-suggestion so that one imagine that everything be a targeted aggression. If everything is stalking, there is no State/Government-organized Stalking.

For instance,
 is a commercial media network, formally based in France and Belgium, area where an independent network diffusing real information about State/Government-organized Stalking and State terrorism would be rapidly led to bankruptcy. It is not the profile of a structure working for spreading real information, while there are all the characteristics of the opposite.                    

There is a lot of these sites, also in Canada and USA, whose only goal is, if one analyses their material, to spread the theory of mysterious entities and to diffuse apparently scientific information, actually for producing and increasing psychosis in predisposed people. The final goal is to discredit real targets and to worsen the conditions of real target in precarious psychological conditions. Not only. Also other people, not targets of anything, or targets of different operations, convince themselves that whatever posture of other people has the only function of targeting them. Since these are easily provable as personal phobias, all that discredits the mass of real targets, in addition to spreading deceptions. Ordinary people believe to whatever professional video as the revealed truth instead of questioning about who produced it, and who paid and why, and for spreading what real contents. They are paid with the State/government-NATO funds for State terrorism & State/Government-organized Stalking. Actually, they are gaslighting, real gaslighting.  

Street gaslighting and theatre, deceptively presented as immanent, simply would be too complex and would require an excess of energies from Secret Police corps managing State/Government-organized Stalking operations. Gang-stalking Secret Police officers do not have infinite funds. They do not want to be directly involved on the field. They nearly always use interfaces. They dislike street operations. They do not have tens or hundreds of people for street operations. On the contrary it is very convenient to spread deceptions, under the form of persuasive professional videos, or good sounding texts, suggestible people report and spread as real science and truths.

There is a sure technique for sounding agreeable to naïve people: it is sufficient to satisfy people’s paranoias. Never contradict them and tell them what they would like to listen. If they strongly dislike a colour, a number, a posture, public works’ noise, coughing people, etc etc, just tell them that a mysterious sect is targeting them! That is what currently done from the Secret Police corps, and their co-operators and contractors, involved in organizing, managing and exploiting State/Government-organized Stalking: crating a deceptive ‘gang-stalking’ sub-culture.        

It is a mystification, absolute deception, to write: “Under Occupational Health and Safety laws, individuals are being flagged and placed on community notification lists.” That has the function to deceive that Secret Police officers actually contacts all the milieus frequented from the targeted, ask for active cooperation for destroying the target’s life and organize the target’s annihilation. 

Such definition, although complete, hides and deceives what “flagging” be:
“Gang Stalking is a systemic form of control, which seeks to destroy every aspect of a Targeted Individuals life. Once a target is flagged a notification is sent out to the community at large, and the target is followed around 24/7 by the various communities that they are in.
“The community notifications will go out to various places. Apartment rentals, future employers, stores and communities where the target visits, will be notified. Doctors offices, fire departments, police, etc. A covert investigation might also be opened, and electronic, means used by the civilian spies/snitches as part of the overt and covert monitoring and surveillance process.
“Individuals can be flagged designating them as having a history of aggressive or inappropriate behavior. This notification system will follow the target if they move, change jobs, visit other areas. It let’s the community believe that the target is a person who needs to be watched or monitored.”

“Flagging” simply is at least a Secret Police officer, acting on the basis of a government secret decree against the target, asking for active (even worldwide) cooperation for destroying the target’s life and organizing the target’s annihilation: “...We need your help... He/she must not work, study, live... He/she must be pushed to... We cannot explain... You must not obstruct our action... ...We can destroy you too...”

An additional mystification is to present State/Government-organized Stalking as a “Soviet/Stasi-style” community, spontaneous, crime now happening even in the ‘free world’. State/Government-organized Stalking always happened in the ‘free world’ and Soviet/Stasi- or Nazi-style persecutions were only legalistic forms of this traditional ‘liberal world’ State crime, ‘liberal’ State social terrorism against its own subjects.

There is a lot of deceptive rubbish about “why do people participate in State/Government-organized Stalking?” There is no real reason apart from the ‘normal’ subordination to power and the propensity of the average louse to commit crimes and insanities behind the shield of State/government impunity and secrecy.

Secret Police officers allow people to not cooperate with them while they not allow people to interfere with State/Government-organized Stalking. In practice, invited-to-attend-subjects cannot refuse cooperation although one can leave the field free. Actually, many invited-to-attend-people cannot leave the field free and, so, they must cooperate with Secret Police insanities and crimes.

Simply, “a perp’s psychology” does not exist. It is just State/government-organized deception. The same institutions’, Statesmen/women’s and Secret Police officers’, propensity to commit insanities and crimes derives from their unaccountability. The State Secret creates unaccountability. For deceiving about that, they try inventing “perps’ psychologies”.

The large majority of militians are actually made sicker and killed from the same State/Government-organized Stalking machine they are part of. Some ephemeral omnipotence feeling precedes their real participation in the State/Government-organized Stalking machine. Just their dirty jobs start, they are plunged into depression and impotence feelings, anxieties from failures, and they need to be narcotized, what does not avoid their breakdowns and other illnesses. They are casually and ad hoc recruited in whatever social environment, of whatever educational level, and affected from whatever pathology and submitted to whatever psycho treatment. There is no louses/militians’ typology.      

The same Secret Police officers are generally fearful, depressed and impotent clerks, with maniacal and criminal personalities, not even fully understanding what they are doing, and discharged and assassinated from power just there is some accident or risk of publicity. ...Ordinary louses...

A psychopathology of Statesmen/women using Secret Police corps for insanities and crimes depressing economy and society would be dominated by the categories of borderline and protected omnipotence deliria. The massive philosophizing and psychologising about “perps’ psychology” is just State/Government-organized deception about State/Government-organized Stalking.

Of course, this deceptive literature tries to confuse also about “How are targets chosen?” ...Only deceptive rubbish is produced about that. It would be really arduous to imagine that insane criminal Statesmen/women, and their Secret Police officers and academicians (as well as their trade-union, political parties, societies etc militians) could rationally select targets for State/Government-organized Stalking operations are absolutely irrational and totally without any finally constructive reason. They cannot. Target are casually selected from maniacal-criminal and corrupted institutions, and their louses, obviously simulating scientific selection processes that actually there are not.

On the contrary, this deceptive literature tries to invent some rationality, some justification. No, there is no justification or guiltiness about having been selected as a target. No target is selected for some real reason. State/Government casually select targets for trying producing additional subjects for mafias and terrorisms they manage.

Actually, they frequently fail. Finally, for big State terrorist operations, from the 11/9 (or 9/11) to the 7/7, Secret Police corps have to directly act without any ‘external’ terrorist interface. Later, they invent this interface, by propaganda: nobody knows the BinLaden interview that he had no role in the 11/9 (or 9/11) while everybody ‘knows’ that he was assassinated as revenge for his [inexistent] role in it. Even narcotic trafficking is finally largely directly managed by States/governments and their military & police international transportation services.

Billion dollars, pound and euros spent for creating State/Government-managed mafias and terrorisms are not sufficient for hiding the State/Government role in them. These State/government clandestine operations are everyday more public, ...for those are not totally brainwashed. Despite States/Governments spend billion dollars, pound and euros for creating State/Government-managed mafias and terrorisms, States/Governments are largely obliged to directly act, without any interface for trying hiding themselves and their insane criminal activities. 

10 January 2012

Letter from Lhasa, number 265. (Stein 2010): Get a Great Job When You Don't Have a Job

Letter from Lhasa, number 265. (Stein 2010): Get a Great Job When You Don't Have a Job   
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Stein, M., Get a Great Job When You Don't Have a Job, McGraw Hill, 2010.
(Stein 2010).
Marky Stein


The main message of this books seems to be: “Not to have fear!” Fearless résumés, fearless interviewing, fearless career change.

A résumé will be judged 80% on what the reader sees in the first lines. Basically, an employer wants greater profits. Since ageism biases, it is better not to claim more than 10-15 year experience.

In an interview, avoid the imposter syndrome when you are not at all an impostor.

Career change is a question of focusing on what one likes more although be frequently a question of real chances to be ready to catch. Transferable skills and talents make people able to a multiplicity of professions with apparently radically different labels.


Stein, M., Get a Great Job When You Don't Have a Job, McGraw Hill, 2010.

Letter from Lhasa, number 264. (Wynn 2010): The Real Truth About Success

Letter from Lhasa, number 264. (Wynn 2010): The Real Truth About Success   
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Wynn, G., The Real Truth About Success. What the Top 1 Percent Do Differently, Why They Won’t Tell You, and How You Can Do It Anyway, McGraw Hill, 2010.
(Wynn 2010).
Garrison Wynn 


This book is addressed “To everyone who has come to understand that just being good at what you do is not enough.”

There are different myths about success. They are just myths. Who got success has no reason to contradict them. Who diffuses them has no reason to go against what is currently believed, and “sold” and “drunk”.

For example, contrarily to the usual sugary optimism, “negativity in the workplace can be an effective catalyst for improvement and progress.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 4)

The best products are not necessarily the most successful: “People will choose a mediocre product over a good one, as long as it fills a need.” (Wynn 2010, p. 5). People “choose what makes them comfortable, whether it’s the best or not.” (Wynn 2010, p. 6). Idem for ideas. They must be easy to digest.

Smarter or smartest people are generally not understood, so, generally, they are not successful. Genius is NOT the foundation of success.

We believe these lies about success, because “We believe what’s easy to believe.” (Wynn 2010, p. 10)

“[...] clarity, not intelligence, is the biggest determinant of success.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 8)

“Some lies are easy to believe because it’s just simpler to believe them than to question them.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 11)

“The fact is people typically do business with people they trust, people they’ve got a great relationship with.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 12)

A key element is turning disadvantage in advantage. Naturally it is easier to talk about that after having realised that, than to always finding the way of doing that.

There are some assumptions:
“# People are most likely to bond with people who listen more than they talk.
“# People are most likely to agree with people who do not make them feel wrong.
“# People are most likely to value a solution they helped to create.
“# People are most likely to abandon a complex process, even if it works.
“# People are most likely to choose what they’re comfortable with, whether or not it’s the best.
“# People are most likely to follow leaders who make them feel important; those leaders are most likely to elicit the best performance.
“These observations all point to the power of influence being seated in trust, clarity, and comfort. This chapter explores all six observations, starting with the first three that intertwine to create what I call the building blocks of trust.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 114)

Actually, people follow who or what has power over them. However, if they may and can chose, the assumptions above are probably precise. People follow who offer solutions seem acceptable and confortable, if nobody in a position of authority pushes towards different options. If people were really free to follow their personal best, the world would be without conflicts and problems created from other people. Unfortunately, reality is more complicate. We choose something because it seems better, not because it be really better. We operate in regimes of largely incomplete information. Information is costly.   

“Trust is built on a foundation of two things: compassion and competence.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 115)

“The pure power of making people feel heard is the foundation of earning trust.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 116)

“Whatever you’re selling—a product, a management style, a strategy, a solution, an idea—people are more likely to buy it if you listen more than you talk.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 116)

“We are narcissistic; the idea that sounds best to us is the one we were thinking of already. No idea looks better than my idea. So my idea coming from you is a fantastic idea. Whatever you just said that sounds like an idea I already had—that must be a great idea because it’s living in my head, and you just said it.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 122)

However, in these operations, it is easy to think we are very astute when we are just cunning and the others perceive we are just cunning. In such a case, the other perceives as cheated.

Of course, this book contains a long list of advices on how to behave and not to behave, on what to perceive and what not to perceive.

“First-Level Lesson
“The real truth about success is that not only do we not like to talk about the real truth, but we don’t necessarily want to hear it.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 198)

“Second-Level Lesson
“What it takes to get to the top may be something that a lot of us are unwilling to do.”
(Wynn 2010, p. 207)

For those who have not time to read the whole book, there is a summary in the last chapter, chapter 10.


Wynn, G., The Real Truth About Success. What the Top 1 Percent Do Differently, Why They Won’t Tell You, and How You Can Do It Anyway, McGraw Hill, 2010.

Letter from Lhasa, number 263. Politics of Massage

Letter from Lhasa, number 263. Politics of Massage
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Capellini, S., and M. Van Welden, Massage for Dummies, Wiley Publishing, 2010.
Steve Capellini,
Michel Van Welden
(Capellini 2010)

Stubbs, K. R., and L.-A. Saulnier, Erotic Massage. The Tantric Touch of Love, Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
Kenneth Ray Stubbs,
Louise-Andrée Saulnier
(Stubbs 1998)


Humans, as well as other animals, need to touch each other and their skin needs to “breathe”, so to be in communication with external air not only with other humans.

Orphans not touched from anybody die. In times of crises, as the Middles Ages, people did not touch too much and massaging was not at all popular.  

“Many people just can’t seem to understand that massage is anything more than indulgence, luxury, and pampering, so they pass on it.” (Capellini 2010, p. 51). Consequently, it may be subversive, relatively to other ‘languages’, or it may simply reveal as a form of manipulation.

Politics of massage is politics of health and pleasure, because massage is a healthy and pleasant activity, decidedly with a marked spirituality:
“In massage, you have to go beyond the moves pretty quickly. You need to develop a ‘moveless movement,’ or flow, in which you’re concentrating not on your own technique but on your partner’s feelings, sensations, and reactions, just like a musician who forgets all about notes and scales, sharps and  flats, and even the instrument itself. Your movements are the technique, the body you massage is the instrument, and it’s the interaction between the two that makes the music. In other words, massage — not the movements required to produce the sensations — is the music, the communication, the thing that you create.” (Capellini 2010, p. 135-36)

For a good sensual massage, what one needs are just the right intention, spontaneity and sensitivity. (Capellini 2010, p. 264). It has the advantage of involving the whole bodies.

If, instead of planning and implementing insanities and crimes, Statesmen/women and other policy-makers practiced massage, they would make the world better instead of worse as they currently do. Organizing and implementing terrorism and organized criminality, Statesmen/women and other policy-makers break communication channels among people and inside subjects, instead of promoting wealthy and synergetic flows of energy. 


Capellini, S., and M. Van Welden, Massage for Dummies, Wiley Publishing, 2010.

Stubbs, K. R., and L.-A. Saulnier, Erotic Massage. The Tantric Touch of Love, Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, New York, NY, USA, 1998. 

Letter from Lhasa, number 262. (Farber 2008): Meta-Magick. The Book of ATEM

Letter from Lhasa, number 262. (Farber 2008): Meta-Magick. The Book of ATEM
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Farber, P. H., Meta-Magick. The Book of ATEM. Achieving New States of Consciousness Through NLP, Neuroscience and Ritual, WeiserBooks, USA, 2008.
(Farber 2008).
Philip H. Farber


In this book, NLP is used for creating an exoteric frame. Remapping one’s own mind, include here a memetic entity, Atem, representing as an extension of the individual mind and perception to the whole universe.

In practice, instead of a well defined and bounded NLP reframing, what is performed is a kind of an open-bounded, limitless, reframing. “A path is formed by walking on it” is a living reality allowing the subject to try new ways, new paths, outside the usual ones.

In NLP, language creates consciousness. Here, it is create a language consistent with this broader consciousness. YOU create Atem.

The suggested exercises are progressive and introduce to this broader world.   


Farber, P. H., Meta-Magick. The Book of ATEM. Achieving New States of Consciousness Through NLP, Neuroscience and Ritual, WeiserBooks, USA, 2008.

Letter from Lhasa, number 261. (Payen de La Garanderie 2009): La Sophrologie

Letter from Lhasa, number 261. (Payen de La Garanderie 2009): La Sophrologie  
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Payen de La Garanderie, A., La Sophrologie, Eyrolles, Paris, France, 2009.
(Payen de La Garanderie 2009).
Agnès Payen de La Garanderie


“La prévention des maladies fonctionnelles est possible dans une très large mesure. L’apprentissage du contrôle et de la maîtrise du stress excessif, la stimulation de la pensée positive, la connaissance de soi, le respect de la bonne hygiène de vie et une alimentation saine, peuvent contribuer à résoudre partiellement ce grave problème.”
(Payen de La Garanderie 2009, p. 11)

Sophrology is here presented as a new vision of the world, allowing the passage from life to existence, comprehending an epistemology, a hermeneutics and a methodology. 

Actually, it is a usual set of exercises, from relaxation to self-suggestion. The usual goal is managing existential problems of a subject looking for some external source of ‘truth’.

Individuals like to pay for classes deresponsabilizing them if they do not get any real result. The same fact of registering and paying is reassuring, for a while. If they get no result, that is attributed to causes external to themselves.


Payen de La Garanderie, A., La Sophrologie, Eyrolles, Paris, France, 2009.

07 January 2012

Letter from Lhasa, number 260. (Wind 2006): The Power of Impossible Thinking

Letter from Lhasa, number 260. (Wind 2006): The Power of Impossible Thinking
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Wind, Y., and C. Crook, The Power of Impossible Thinking. Transform the Business of Your Life and the Life of Your Business, Pearson Education Inc., 2006.
(Wind 2006).
Yoram (Jerry) Wind,
Colin Crook,
Robert Gunther


We see what we think. For changing the world, one needs first to change one’s own thinking.

Mental models are useful and, at the same time, they may become obstacles or to cause disasters. There are no formal recipes for success either for changing these recipes when not anymore adequate. 

Impossible thinking is simply the skill to find solutions before unimaginable. The point would eventually be about the adequacy of the new solutions and whether they would be really innovative relatively to the old ones.

Actually, the large majority of innovative people is slave of current pattern of thinking. Consequently, only casually, and in a very limited field (generally concerning the profession of the innovator), what are considered innovative people may find some innovative solution.


“What you think is what you do.” (Wind 2006). If one sees what one thinks, obviously one, everyone, acts according to one’s own mental patterns.


Wind, Y., and C. Crook, The Power of Impossible Thinking. Transform the Business of Your Life and the Life of Your Business, Pearson Education Inc., 2006.

Letter from Lhasa, number 259. (Heath 2010): Switch. How to Change Things When Change Is Hard

Letter from Lhasa, number 259. (Heath 2010): Switch. How to Change Things When Change Is Hard
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Heath, C., and D. Heath, Switch. How to Change Things When Change Is Hard, Broadway Books, New York, NY, USA, 2010.  
(Heath 2010).
Chip Heath,
Dan Heath


“But when Elephants and Riders move together, change can come easily.” (Heath 2010, p. 15).

Problem solving works by sequences of small solutions, rarely by grandiose plans.

The more there are options, the more people are unable to decide. Limited options are decidedly more popular than their proliferation. Complexity, uncertainty, ambiguity lead to decision paralysis, what is deadly for change.   

Understanding is not a key element for change. Sometimes, scare produces change.

With common people, psychology works better than pure maths. In first instance, people refuse change.

Actually, change is introduced either from people in charge or by tricks. If there are improvements, change is appreciated later.


Heath, C., and D. Heath, Switch. How to Change Things When Change Is Hard, Broadway Books, New York, NY, USA, 2010. 

Letter from Lhasa, number 258. (Sayre 2001): Unstoppable Confidence. Unleash your Natural Confidence Within

Letter from Lhasa, number 258. (Sayre 2001): Unstoppable Confidence. Unleash your Natural Confidence Within
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Sayre, K., Unstoppable Confidence. Unleash your Natural Confidence Within, Unstoppable Books, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2001.  
(Sayre 2001).
Kent Sayre


“By changing your language you change your life” is one of the basic NLP techniques of this book.

Confidence is the ability to achieve goals. Consequently, a founding aspect is to interiorise this ability. One can do it by deactivating negative internal voices while activating the positive ones.

That is less easy that it may seem. In fact, many ‘confident’ people simply show optimism, what is different from a deep and real confidence. To show is not necessarily, or rarely is, to be, as well as positive language (positive relatively to goals) is different from sugary languages.  

As first step, or one of the first steps, the author suggests suppressing doubts from language, using only absolutistic expression, about what one intend to do.

Basically, it is the problem of confidence, which is different from showing confidence as well from convincing people showing a confidence they have not.

“There’s also a confidence at the level of belief. This level means that, you believe you’re confident. You think so, you think you’re confident. You’re pretty sure. You say, ‘I am confident’. But the ideal is to get to a point where, you are so absolutely confident that it’s a given. You don’t need to think about it anymore. You are confident. You just are confident. It’s your way of being. So, if you think about your beliefs, some of them, you’re not even aware of since they’re just a given. It’s just natural. If you’ve integrated your occupation into your identity, like you’re a salesperson or you’re a doctor, or you’re a nurse, or you’re an attorney or whatever. That’s just a given. It’s not a belief that you have. It’s just your way of being. You know no differently.”
(Sayre 2001, p. 38)

Learn from mistakes. To see the positive aspect of everything and everybody. Even if one cannot always control the outside world, one can always control oneself. Avoiding mind-reading, or to suppose mind-reading, other people will improve your communication with other people. Assumptions about other people are frequently wrong. Conjectures are usually deceptive.

Of course, near the end this Americanish book, there are “twenty explosive techniques for unstoppable confidence”. Decidedly too many, even if the field is complex. Basically, what people need is a combination of visualization and action for building positive and confident habits.


Sayre, K., Unstoppable Confidence. Unleash your Natural Confidence Within, Unstoppable Books, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2001.

30 October 2011

Letter from Lhasa, number 257. Lula’s Cancer. Can Maledictions Produce Cancers?

Letter from Lhasa, number 257. Lula’s Cancer. Can Maledictions Produce Cancers?   
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

I occasionally and informally healed people by the power of my hands.

The last case was a female with a brain cancer. She should be submitted to a surgical operation because the cancer was becoming too big. In practice, her skull should be opened and the cancer removed, for what was possible. I told her that all that was horrible and that perhaps it was possible to try other solutions. There were clear psychological and environmental/familiar reasons for her disease.

I imposed my hands, various times, in a few days, over her skull while talking to her about her disease. After some weeks, she was checked again, a radiography. She told me that her brain cancer had regressed and that she did not need anymore the surgery. I do not know the subsequent evolution of the case, because I was not anymore in touch with this person, so I could not anyway influence, or try influence, this case.

Of course, I have not decisive evidence of a casual relation between my attempts and the temporary (I had no further news) favourable evolution of this cancer. It may have been everything casual, or just self-suggestion of this person. However, suggestions and self-suggestions are key medical devices. The same medicines are, in part, a form of self-suggestion while they, not infrequently, produce other diseases.     

It is curious what is happening in Brazil, at Presidency level.  

In 2009, the same Dilma Rousseff had a cancer, a breast cancer. In 2010, she was elected new Brazilian President. It was since a Lula’s manoeuvre. He planned and implemented it since the Constitutional prohibition of a third consecutive mandate. So he needed to have somebody else ‘temporarily’ in office, for the 2011..2014 4-year-term. He chose the candidate he judged the weakest and totally dependent on him.

In history, apparent puppets may reveal well stronger than previously supposed. Institutional power becomes personal power and strength. In four years, many things may happen and a President is always a President.

The Brazilian Constitution is US style, not Russian style. In Russia, Putin, as a Prime Minister, could substantially preserve all the powers he had when he was a President and to become again a President after a for-year-term of ‘his’ Dmitry Medvedev. In practice, whatever the detailed reason, President Dmitry Medvedev could not annihilate the Putin’s (and the Putin’s power block) plan to going on as a Russian permanent dictator ...until a new one will be able to replace him.   

In Brazil, a President is the head of the government while an ex-President has to wait for the next presidential elections, if one has the ambition to try to become again a ruler. Of course, other hypothesis would have been abstractly possible. However, Brazil is an extremely space, even at the highest levels, and, frequently, in such contexts, rulers have not sufficient fantasy or culture for pursuing ‘lateral’ solutions.   

Now, it was discovered that Lula had a cancer, a throat cancer (malignant tumour in the larynx), what could undermine his possibilities to be a credible candidate in 2014, if he will be alive at that time. 2014 is far.

If he will be perfectly healed, he might perhaps come out even stronger from this defy, if nothing else will strike him. Perhaps, he could be stricken in a judicial way, although that might also not happen. It will largely depend on the intentions and real powers of Dilma. Anyway, Brazilians have no illusion on the morality of many of their rulers and honesty may not be a key factor. That (judicial strikes and purges) is a complex field with many propaganda and brain-washing and -conditioning aspects.    

Lula is a subject emotionally unstable, with neurological disorders driving him to pathological laughing and crying. Contextually inappropriate or exaggerated outbursts of laughter and crying without commensurate feelings are precisely that. It is nothing serious-serious. However, all that influences physical illnesses.

Now he is panicking. What does not help. That, on the contrary, is aggravating his physical pathologies. Very probably, traditional cares will only weaken his body.

What is the evidence that he is panicking? There are not his direct declarations. The only ‘news’ is that he is resting in his home. ...A popular and populist subject incapable of talking directly about his illness while depicted as very optimistic about it? Not even a short walk to the newsagent?

Optimistic reports from people supposedly near him are just propaganda, although even the people taking care of his image do not seem very skilful. They are managing it in the worst way, ...for him. It may be in best way, for his enemies   

Lula plunged in deep depression and panic just informed of the cancer. Traditional therapies do not help, in such a case. They will only weaken his body without healing him.

Of course, if somebody wanted to replace his, he-she-they would prefer him dead. They have just t wait, if he will not be assisted in some innovative way, what is not in the interest of those would eventually like to replace him. 

22 October 2011

Letter from Lhasa, number 256. La signora Emma Marcegaglia vuole altri soldi per le oligarchie predatorie sue

Letter from Lhasa, number 256. La signora Emma Marcegaglia vuole altri soldi per le oligarchie predatorie sue
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Bastano alcune battute della Presidenta di Confindustria per comprendere come si sia trattato di una giornata dalle dichiarazioni esplicite e dense di significato.

Un elemento è il servilismo verso il Presidente della Repubblica, e quello questa carica istituzionale rappresenta, soprattutto dal 1992-Capaci.
“"In un momento così difficile è punto di riferimento per noi e per il mondo intero"” http://goo.gl/0t5qZ
La cupola istituzionale compradora delle buro-oligarchie predatorie è punto di riferimento di Confindustria che dunque riafferma la propria subordinazione al suo rappresentante organico, il Presidente. Sono dello stesso blocco buro-predatorio. Ognuno rende omaggio agli altri, almeno in pubblico. La stessa Confindustria conferma che l’Impero governa Italiozia tramite il Quirinale.

L’altro elemento è la richiesta di soldi per il ‘capitalismo’ comprador-predatorio di para-Stato.
“Poi la Marcegaglia va al sodo, criticando le scelte - ancora in divenire - dell'esecutivo: "Da quello che sappiamo fino ad oggi le cose di cui si parla sono deludenti. Il tempo è scaduto, adesso bisogna decidere. Chiediamo al governo di non fare piccole cose, ma di avere il coraggio di fare le grandi riforme senza rimanere bloccati a problemi elettoralistici". Secondo la leader degli industriali le misure per lo sviluppo non possono essere varate "a costo zero". Ma questo "non vuol dire - ha proseguito Marcegaglia - che dobbiamo aumentare il deficit o il debito, che vanno tenuti sotto controllo. Vuol dire che bisogna tagliare da alcune parti per investire da un’altra parte".” http://goo.gl/0t5qZ

Insomma, la Presidenta di confindustria chiama ‘sviluppo’ l’incremento della solita politica dei sussidi. Nello specifico, Confindustria chiede più soldi allo Stato per sé. Li chiede tagliandoli ad altri settori predatori. È la solita logica dei gruppi di ricatto, in reciproca competizione, del sistema predatorio, per cui ognuno cerca di fare le scarpe agli altri.

Non chiede di tagliare il 75% della spesa corrente. Non chiede di tagliare gli stessi sussidi alle aziende di area Mediobanca-Confindustria. Non chiede di abolire la CIG. Non chiede le pensioni a 70 anni. Non denuncia che la ‘sanità’ è un mercato che produce malattie solo per far soldi grazie alla spesa pubblica enorme per il settore. Chiede solo più soldi per la sua cosca.

Chiede di continuare nella solita logica sottosviluppista voluta dall’Impero, e di cui il Quirinale è tutore, ma con più soldi per la cosca predatoria Confindustria rappresenta.

Ovviamente, condisce il tutto con la solita demagogia:
“Il presidente di Confindustria ha ricordato che la sua associazione ha fatto alcune proposte: per esempio intervento sulla spesa pubblica e sulle pensioni; liberalizzazioni e riduzione delle tasse per lavoratori e imprese. "Alla fine - ha concluso - il risultato sui conti pubblici deve essere zero".” http://goo.gl/0t5qZ

Appunto, è solo copertura. Come ridurre le tasse, senza abbattere lo Stato predatorio? Se non le pagano ‘lavoratori ed imprese’, chi le pagano, i disoccupati, i residenti svizzeri ed evasori fiscali di Mediobanca-Confindustria che controllano l'oligarchia comprador-buro-predatoria, i turisti?

Le tasse le pagano sempre e solo i ‘lavoratori ed imprese’. Per cui, o si taglia lo Stato predatorio, di cui Presidenza della Repubblica e Mediobanca-Confindustria sono tutori ed espressione organica, oppure sono solo chiacchiere per mascherare che le cosche di regime vogliono unicamente altri soldi a spese di chi lavora, a spese dei veri ‘lavoratori ed imprese’. Sennò come avrebbero gli stessi soldi per liturgie vuote come tali convegni politico-mafiosi e per apparati politico-mafiosi come tutta la rete, costosissima, di sindacati ed associazioni, come la stessa Confindustria?

In punto è proprio quel debito pubblico verso il 130% PIL che distrugge il sistema finanziario, e dunque quello produttivo, e che è pure fuori controllo dato che tutti i gruppi predatori vogliono più soldi per loro. Lo si elimina solo sopprimendo il 75% della spesa corrente, che è puro spreco, e che deprime, con la sua stessa esistenza, il sistema economico, impedendo ogni sviluppo. La Marcegaglia non può dire nulla. Chiede solo più soldi per i suoi.

Q.E.D.

05 October 2011

Letter from Lhasa, number 255. Berlusconi ed il gang-stalking

Letter from Lhasa, number 255. Berlusconi ed il gang-stalking
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Berlusconi è un caso clamoroso di gang-stalking, gang-stalking di Stato-NATO ovviamente. Messo nella lista di gang-stalking dei CC-NATO (che il governo formale non controlla, bensì li controlla, al 100% da Capaci, la PresidenzaRep&Csm) ad inizio 1994, v'è restato ininterrottamente e con gang-stalking contro di lui intensificato dalla Presidenza Napolitano il cui ardore super-compradoro (sbilanciato dal lato degli imperi UK ed USA) è ormai pubblico.
La Presidenza Napolitano ha aggiunto alle inchieste standard, aperte (a Milano e Palermo) il giorno stesso che Berlusconi è entrato ufficialmente in politica, su ‘corruzione’ e ‘mafia’, le montature ‘sesso’. Il signor Giorgio Napolitano, l’abbia fatto per sue predisposizioni o su precisi ordini imperiali, ha voluto evidentemente dare alle persecuzioni contro Silvio Berlusconi un tocco ‘sporcaccione’, visto le montature precedenti ed in corso si erano rivelate insufficienti alla liquidazione del bersaglio. 
Il bersaglio di gang-stalking Silvio Berlusconi è anche un caso tipico di sindrome di Stoccolma. In pratica, il masochista Silvio gode ad essere perseguitato e si schiera dal lato dei gang-stalkizzatori che non per questo la smettono di gang-stalkizzarlo, né lo gang-stalkizzano meno. Non difende le libertà degli altri, sia per sindrome di Stoccolma che per paura di non poter difendere le sue, sebbene non a caso, non sappia e non possa difendere neppure le sue. 
Berlusconi si era creato la giustificazione che valeva la pena essere gang-stalkizzato pur di potere espandere la propria ricchezza. Anche quest’aspetto è dubbio visto che il progetto ‘mediobancario’ (di quell’area politico-economica compradora) di espropriarlo non è mai stato accantonato. La sua presenza in politica, che non è detto possa essere eterna, ha dilazionato la sua espropriazione totale. Tra l’altro lui è piuttosto acciaccato, anche per interiorizzazione profonda dei danni da gang-stalking, che su di lui sono certi ed evidenti. E coloro di cui s’attornia non sembrano essere all’altezza di fonteggiare (anche solo di capire) operazioni di questo tipo.  
La recente sentenza che ha provocato la fuoriuscita dal gruppo di Berlusconi di ben 564 euro-milioni è buona dimostrazione addizionale di come il gang-stalking lavori a beneficio degli stalkizzatori. Ed è anche un indice della metodologia di falsificazione su cui il gang-stalking si fonda. L’esproprio è stato giudizialmente fondato sullo sbianchettamento di atti giudiziari inconsistenti con l’esproprio stesso. Si è dunque costruita una forma legale fondata sulla falsificazioni di precedenti atti giudiziari, già essi stessi montature CC-giudiziarie. Il tutto è formalmente legittimo naturalmente. I timbri, le firme e le forme rendono rendono legittima qualunque grande e piccola purga, come ogni altra cosa, qualunque crimine di Stato!  
Anche il gang-stalking è sempre formalmente legittimo, in apparenza. Il gang-stalking è infatti una persecuzione totale contro il bersaglio tramite sistematici crimini ed insanità di Stato, crimini ed insanità coperti dal segreto di Stato, per cui formalmente non sono impugnabili come crimini ed insanità criminali. Crimini tecnicamente non perseguibili sono come inesistenti rispetto al sistema legal-giudiziario. 

Letter from Lhasa, number 254. La crisi dello Stato predatorio greco sta tutta in due cifre: 50% e 40%

Letter from Lhasa, number 254. La crisi dello Stato predatorio greco sta tutta in due cifre: 50% e 40%  
by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

La Grecia è uno Stato predatorio, nel senso che preda i suoi sudditi, non solo la UE, per alimentare oligarchie parassitarie sia ricchissime che miserabili. Le oligarchie predatorie straricche si mascherano sempre dietro ad una massa di miserabili, ‘impiegati’ pubblici e privati poco pagati, variamente corrotti e che coprono dietro un ‘consenso popolare’ i predatori primari.
Italiozia non è qualitativamente differente. La crisi dello Stato predatorio italico è solo appena più controllata perché la tassazione e sempre stata più elevata, aspetto pagato con uno sviluppo-sottosviluppo prossimo allo zero. La Grecia si è mantenuta un po’ al di sopra dello sviluppo medio dell’eurozona, per sprofondare nella recessione da un triennio, in pratica con la sua crisi fiscale ora evidente e pubblica.
È una leggenda che spesa pubblica e debito pubblico producano sviluppo. Lo sviluppo, come mostrano le avanguardie tecnologiche est-asiatiche (uscite rapidamente da storici sottosviluppi tecnologici), dipende da altre variabili. Lo sviluppo può essere statalista, anzi lo è sempre anche se c’è chi ama dire il contrario. Dipende ovviamente da che statalismo, non da quello deteriore che non casualmente è proprio quello dominante nel mondo. È deteriore quando non sa coniugarsi con l’efficienza sia statuale che privata. Quando lo Stato non è gestito come un azienda, esso si trasforma in predatorio.   
Il ‘liberalismo’ come comunemente inteso è una leggenda. Anche lo ‘statalismo’ lo è. Il libero scambio non garantisce sviluppo se un’area non è ancora competitiva. Il protezionismo non garantisce sviluppo se protegge il sottosviluppo. Solo oligarchie relativamente isolate (come indicato dalla teoria e pratica del developmental State; isolate dalle pressioni particolari) possono gestire un’uscita dal sottosviluppo verso lo sviluppo competitivo. Questo è chiaro in tutta l’Asia dell’est, composta da casi da manuale su queste cose. Lo schema politologico e socio-economico non cambia per aree vogliano uscire dall’infognamento o dallo sprofondamento irreversibile nel sotto sviluppo.
Italiozia è un ottimo esempio di combinazione storica (da quando esiste, dal 1860-61) sia di infognamento che di sprofondamento nel sottosviluppo pur ai margini, ai confini, di aree ricchissime e di competitività tecnologica. È ormai mezzo secolo, dopo il breve miracolo economico post-bellico evidentemente non gradito all’Impero (che infatti ne impose la liquidazione), di rinnovato ciclo sottosviluppista italico.  
Lo sviluppo dipende da come i soldi vengano spesi e per cosa. Creare solo stipendi non è sviluppo. Tra l’altro, lo sviluppo vero ne creerebbe ben di più. Lo sviluppo competitivo crea occupazione e ricchezza. La sola occupazione e ricchezza non creano sviluppo competitivo. Tra l’altro, lo sviluppo competitivo ne creerebbe ben di più di entrambe. La sola distribuzione di stipendi ed accumulazione di ricchezza (inevitabilmente da parte di minoranze) non creano alcuno sviluppo, anzi, alla fine, distruggono ogni meccanismo di accumulazione dunque di produzione di ricchezza.
Imperi sono crollati, o si sono alla fine rapidamente esauriti, per avere accumulato ricchezza mentre distruggevano competitività tecnologica. Si può sopravvivere alla deindustrializzaione. Nessuno sopravvive alla perdità di competitività, che si si fonda sulla ricerca e sviluppo, ed alla perdita dei centri di controllo. Vi sono ovviamente aspetti contrattuali e militari, in ciò. Tuttavia, nessuna forza militare mette al riparo dalla perdità di competitività. Gli imperi solo militari esplodono ed implodono.     
La crisi greca, che non è contingente, né ha uscite prosime, né rapide, né inevitabili, sta tutta in due percentuali. La spesa pubblica è sul 50% PIL mentre la tassazione in senso lato (entrate previdenziali incluse) è sul 40%. Non che la soluzione possa essere la semplice immediata crescita della tassazione che avrebbe effetti inflazionisti ed ulteriormente depressivi di un’economia ora in pesante recessione. Anche perché l’incremento della tassazione alimenterebbe solo la predazione oligarchica e dei loro clienti. D’altro canto, le oligarchie predatorie straricche, che si coprono dietro ad una massa di piccoli clienti parassistari, non sono disposte a rompere il sistema predatorio, né altri, contro di loro, hanno la voglia od il potere o la possibilità di farlo. 
Il debito pubblico greco è o era sul 143% [o quello che è ora, a seconda delle fonti e dei trucchi contabili e dell’evoluzione fiscale greca] PIL, dato non sarebbe di per sé drammatico, seppur rilevantissimo. Il Giappone ha un debito pubblico ben oltre il 200%. Ma il Giappone è il Giappone, per quanto non è detto che lo sia per sempre.
Ovviamente, auto-intossicata da ideologie di diritto-dovere alla questua alla UE, la Grecia (governo ed apparati di propaganda) s’è sempre detta che i sussidi UE sarebbero stati illimitati. Il tipo di ideologia diffusa anche tra accademici greci era: “Intanto se spendiamo comprando beni loro, facciamo loro un favore a spendere soldi loro.” Ciò è quello raccontavano e si raccontavano e raccontano.
Basterebbe, in Grecia, come Italia, come in Germania (dove il debito pubblico è prossimo al 100% PIL ma camuffato da artifici contabili, per cui non contano quello degli Stati della federazione tedesca) etc, uno armato di pennarello per cancellare interi capitoli di spesa, spesa fatta, per almeno i ¾, di sprechi e predazioni e che produce solo o meno sviluppo o sottosviluppo. Non vogliono e non possono farlo. È tutto fuori controllo mentre ometti e donnette di Stato corrono a raccattare soldi ...solo per distruggere ricchezza, in nome delle predazioni di Stato ed all’ombra dello Stato.